Should the Sat Be Required?

First introduced in the year 1926, for numerous years now the sit down, or Scholastic perspicacity render, has been a major part of our high schoolers pedagogics. It is a requirement in order to alum and is a chief determining factor in whether or not a student lead be accepted into certain colleges. In fact, a student could harbor straight Ds and Cs, yet if they were to receive a perfect or near perfect score on this particular test they would be able to expend and be accepted into the most prestigious of schools. I think this is absolutely ludicrous.The sit test is sensation tailored to be mavin of the trickiest youve ever taken, nonpareil that is actually designed to fool you into misunderstanding any(prenominal) forefront. Not to mention the stress that overcomes most students as theyre taking this timed test, second crack every dress and worrying about every little thing until finally the time is up and they feel like a failure. Its wretched to put a stude nt in this automatic teller machine where most are not at their topper test them on random subjects, and then set aside this score to come before every new(prenominal) score theyve ever received in their lifespan.Indeed a quote from Einstein comes to mind as I think about it, Everybody is a genius. But if you hazard afishby its ability to jump a tree, it will live its whole life believing that it is stupid. The SAT has been under test for years now, often accused of being unilateral in the upper class favor. In fact, studies meet shown that students from families with an income less than $20,000 a year received an comely score of 1,310, part students from families with incomes over $200,000 averaged in at about 1,715 a difference of 405 points.There was also a large controversy over the oarsman-regatta analogy question. The purpose of the question poised was to find the couplet of terms that have the relationship most same to the relationship between runner and marat hon. The repair answer was oarsman and regatta. The choice of the correct answer presupposed students familiarity with crew, a sport popular with the wealthy, and so upon their friendship of its structure and terminology.Fifty-three percent of white students correctly answered the question, while only 22% of black students also scored correctly. However, harmonize to Murray and Herrnstein, the black-white gap is smaller in culture-loaded questions like this one than in questions that appear to be culturally neutral. likeness questions have since been replaced by short reading passages. In response to the controversy, a growing number of colleges have chosen to join the SAT optional causa, a movement made popular in the late 1980s.Said colleges do not require the SAT for admission. In a 2001 speech to theAmerican Council on Education,Richard C. Atkinson, the president of theUniversity of California, urged dropping the SAT Reasoning Test as a college admissions requirement, Anyone involved in procreation should be concerned about how overemphasis on the SAT is distorting educational priorities and practices, how the test is perceived by legion(predicate) another(prenominal) as unfair, and how it can have a annihilating impact on the self-esteem and aspirations of young students.There is far-flung agreement that overemphasis on the SAT harms American education. I very much agree with his argument, and many are starting to see his point as well. I am very hopeful that in the growing infamy of the test, it will vanish as a requirement all together, and that the next generation will never have to deal with the problems such a test presents.